20 February 2018 | Colombo, Sri Lanka
By Prof. Jonathan Spencer
Prof. Jonathan Spencer |
Prof. Jonathan Spencer
is Regius Professor of South Asian Language,
Culture and Society at School of Social and Political Science, The University
of Edinburgh, the United Kingdom. Prof. Spencer
has carried out fieldwork in Sri Lanka since the early 1980s, concentrating at
first on rural change and local politics, but writing more recently on ethnic
conflict, political violence and political non-violence. He is currently working
on the fraught boundary between the religious and the political in Sri Lanka
and elsewhere, the history of dissent in Sri Lanka, and the consequences of
forced dislocation for poor communities in cities in Sri Lanka and Pakistan.
Prof. Spencer began his
presentation by locating his intellectual development and his research on Sri
Lanka in a broader Sri Lankan political context. For instance, he had just
completed his undergraduate studies in 1978, the year a new constitution was
introduced to Sri Lanka. During his first stay in Sri Lanka between 1981 and 1983,
he witnessed how elements involved in the 1982 Presidential election reappeared
in 1983 Black July. Then he observed the calamity between 1987 and 1989 from
Europe. Since 1991, he made several visits to Sri Lanka watched the rise of
Chandrika Bandaranaike in 1994. Since 2005, his multiple visits every year saw
the rise and decline of President Rajapaksa.
By elaborating this
interesting overlap between his intellectual development and the developments
in Sri Lankan politics, he moved on to discuss few structural problems of the
Sri Lankan political body, taking his cue from an early article by James Manor.
Manor argued in 1979 that the biggest failure of Sri Lankan politics is the
distance between the political elites and common people. All the other aspects,
including the ethnic cleavages, are secondary to this structural failure. There
are two particular phenomena that Manor pointed out. One is the weak local
democratic institutions. The other is the weak internal party structures.
Expanding on the latter, Manor’s observation here is that there is no a democratic path for a common person in political parties to elevate his position to the leadership level. The obvious exception in this regard is R. Premadasa who fought his way into the elite from outside. The 1980s JVP and the LTTE could both be seen as political movements which directly, but unsuccessfully challenged continuing dominance of the same political elite.
Finally, Prof. Spencer
pointed out that both the JVP and LTTE in the 1980s drew on the widespread
commitment, especially amongst young people, to the idea of capturing state
power by violence. The almost complete disappearance of that idea is perhaps
the biggest change between the 1980s and the present.
External LInks
External LInks
Prof. Jonathan Spencer on Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Spence
Prof. Jonathan Spencer on Global Development Academy - https://www.ed.ac.uk/global-development/about/staff/jonathan-spencer